OSIPP\u57fa\u5e79\u8b1b\u5ea7\u6559\u54e1\u306e8\u6708\u306e\u7814\u7a76\u696d\u7e3e\u3092\u3054\u7d39\u4ecb\u3057\u307e\u3059\u3002<\/p>\n
\u30fb\u677e\u6797\u54f2\u4e5f \u5148\u751f\u3000\u30fb\u9ad9\u7530\u967d\u5948\u5b50 \u5148\u751f<\/strong><\/p>\n \u30fb\u7247\u6850\u6893 \u5148\u751f\u00a0 \u3000 \u30fb\u4e8c\ufa1e\u79c0\u548c \u5148\u751f<\/strong><\/p>\n \u30fb\u5ba4\u5ca1\u5065\u5fd7 \u5148\u751f<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n \u677e\u6797\u54f2\u4e5f<\/strong>\uff08\u8457\u66f8\uff09<\/p>\n \u300e\u4f55\u304c\u6295\u7968\u7387\u3092\u9ad8\u3081\u308b\u306e\u304b\u300f\u6709\u6590\u95a3\uff082023\u5e748\u6708\uff09 \u6982\u8981\uff1a\u671f\u65e5\u524d\u6295\u7968\u671f\u9593\u3084\u6295\u7968\u6240\u306e\u6570\u3001\u9078\u6319\u5553\u767a\u6d3b\u52d5\u3084\u8b70\u54e1\u5b9a\u6570\u306e\u4e0d\u5747\u8861\u306a\u3069\u306e\u6295\u7968\u74b0\u5883\u6761\u4ef6\u306b\u6ce8\u76ee\u3057\u3001\u305d\u308c\u3089\u304c\u3069\u306e\u3088\u3046\u306b\u6295\u7968\u7387\u306b\u5f71\u97ff\u3092\u4e0e\u3048\u3066\u3044\u308b\u306e\u304b\u3092\u5b9f\u8a3c\u7684\u306b\u8ad6\u3058\u3066\u304a\u308a\u3001\u65e5\u672c\u306e\u6709\u6a29\u8005\u3092\u5bfe\u8c61\u3068\u3057\u305f\u6295\u7968\u7387\u306b\u3064\u3044\u3066\u306e\u6700\u65b0\u306e\u7814\u7a76\u6210\u679c\u3092\u308f\u304b\u308a\u3084\u3059\u304f\u89e3\u8aac\u3057\u305f\u3002<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Hinako Takata<\/strong>\uff08\u8ad6\u6587\uff09<\/p>\n \u201cSeparation of Powers in a Globalized Democratic Society: Theorizing the Human Rights Treaty Organs\u2019 Interactions with Various State Organs,\u201d Global Constitutionalism<\/em> (2023) 1\u201330. \uff08\u67fb\u8aad\u6709\uff09\u3000 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S2045381723000114<\/a> Abstract\uff1aAs part of their continuous effort to enhance the effectiveness and democratic legitimacy of human rights treaties, human rights treaty organs have increasingly fostered a direct relationship with various state organs, thereby penetrating the \u2018states\u2019 that traditionally have been treated as monolithic legal entities. Treaty organs review the decision-making process of each type of state organ \u2013 courts, parliaments and administrative organs \u2013 and make remedial orders that are substantially addressed to specific state organs. Such phenomena go hand in hand with the relativization of the distinction between the legal spheres in which human rights treaty organs and state organs operate. This is the first study to address such phenomena as a totality. It constructs the \u2018separation of powers in a globalized democratic society\u2019 theory, thereby proposing how each type of state organ and the treaty organs should interact under human rights treaties. Its findings contribute, first, to the harmonious achievement of the effectiveness and democratic legitimacy of human rights treaties; second, to the reform of the classical paradigm of international law, in which monolithic states are the only relevant legal entities; and third, to the long-standing debates on the relationship between international and national laws from a new angle.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Azusa Katagiri<\/strong>\uff08\u8ad6\u6587\uff09<\/p>\n \u201dRevisiting the puzzle of endogenous nuclear proliferation\u201d Journal of Peace Research<\/em>\uff08\u67fb\u8aad\u6709\uff09 https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/00223433231177727<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Abstract\uff1aNuclear proliferation literature typically differentiates supply-side and demand-side factors influencing the spread of nuclear weapons. These distinct approaches to the proliferation puzzle raise the following empirical questions: Does nuclear supply stimulate states\u2019 demand for nuclear weapons? Conversely, does the demand for nuclear weapons really facilitate the acquisition of nuclear supply? If such endogeneity exists between the demand-side and supply-side determinants, how would it cause empirical bias in the estimation of their effects on nuclear proliferation? This article aims to unpack endogenous mechanisms of nuclear demand and nuclear supply over the course of nuclear proliferation. In particular, it examines two potential sources of endogeneity: (1) simultaneous interactions between states\u2019 nuclear development decisions and nuclear technological capability and (2) selection bias in nuclear development. To address each source of endogeneity, simultaneous equation models and the duration models with selection are estimated, respectively. Contrary to what recent supply-side literature suggests, the empirical analyses reveal that states\u2019 nuclear demand is primarily driven by external security threats instead of their existing nuclear technology, and that their successful acquisition of nuclear technology mainly follows as the result of nuclear development efforts but does not necessarily depend on individual supply-side factors. This article addresses the typical inference issues in nuclear proliferation research and contributes to our synthetic understanding of proliferation mechanisms.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \u4e8c\ufa1e\u79c0\u548c<\/strong>\uff08\u305d\u306e\u4ed6\u306e\u8a18\u4e8b\uff09<\/p>\n\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.yuhikaku.co.jp\/books\/detail\/9784641149472<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n
\n\u203b\u3053\u306e\u8ad6\u6587\u306f\u3001\u5927\u962a\u5927\u5b66\u306e\u52a9\u6210\u306b\u3088\u308a\u3001\u30aa\u30fc\u30d7\u30f3\u30a2\u30af\u30bb\u30b9\u3068\u3057\u3066\u516c\u958b\u3055\u308c\u3066\u3044\u307e\u3059\u3002<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n
\n